Don’t you think pharma should be more interested in curing cancer than advertising their building in some fancy obnoxious way?? I know many other places that money could be spent.
jc (not verified)
October 13th, 2009, 2:41pm
Maybe. But no cash, means no money for research. Advertising generates sales, which generates the cash for everything they else.
Sorry DE, I just cannot agree with you. Now that I am unemployed and seeing things from the outside, I have grown to despise advertising and it’s worth. I don’t see how displaying one’s logo on a building is advertising that generates revenue. With this whole health care reform going on, and me not having health insurance, I just feel bitter knowing that all Americans deserve it. Pharma is evil and we all know it.
Reddit
Facebook
StumbleUpon
Twitter
Comments
This would have been way cooler if it wasn’t advertising for a pharma company. 2 thumbs down.
No credit for a pharma company finally doing something worthwhile?
That was the weakest shit i’ve seen all day
Don’t you think pharma should be more interested in curing cancer than advertising their building in some fancy obnoxious way?? I know many other places that money could be spent.
Maybe. But no cash, means no money for research. Advertising generates sales, which generates the cash for everything they else.
Sorry DE, I just cannot agree with you. Now that I am unemployed and seeing things from the outside, I have grown to despise advertising and it’s worth. I don’t see how displaying one’s logo on a building is advertising that generates revenue. With this whole health care reform going on, and me not having health insurance, I just feel bitter knowing that all Americans deserve it. Pharma is evil and we all know it.
Post new comment