• Introducing The Big Picture: Where Great Photographers and Great Agencies Connect

    / Comments (22)

    The Denver Egotist is proud to announce The Big Picture – a program designed to help Denver photographers and Denver agencies meet, work together, then hopefully do more together after that.

    Here's the concept. Every photographer wants access to the agencies around town, but phone calls and direct mail just aren't cracking doors the way they used to. Every agency needs fresh headshots of its executives or shots of its agency interior. We thought we'd play the middleman and help put you two together.

    The photographers who volunteer for The Big Picture will offer headshots of Denver agency principals or interior shots of participating Denver agencies (whatever your expertise) for free.

    Agencies get to meet and try out great photographers they might not otherwise have found. The photographers get exposure to agencies they might not have an in with. It's a win-win.

    If you want to get in on the program as a photographer or agency, simply send an email along with some details on what you're offering or expecting to the@denveregotist.com with the subject line: "The Big Picture." Of course, Boulder photographers and agencies are invited to participate too.

  • Advice On: Business Cards

    / Comments (18)

    I get that this is probably not the best time to start a new firm, but I am anyway. One of the first disagreements I've had with my partner is about our business cards. I think nice cards are important, she thinks we should hold off. Any thoughts?

    Based on your question, I've surmised that you are a Designer and she is a Copywriter. To a designer, having a nice business card is nearly as important as having a mouse with a working trackball. This is an especially curious requirement considering no designer has ever given a business card to anyone other than their parents or other designers. For a Copywriter, business cards are something they'll use primarily to get the organic cracker seeds from between their teeth. Since toothpicks are so inexpensive, I can understand her hesitation to spend the money.

    Now if I believed you were entering into this business concern with someone on the account side, I might feel differently. To the account person business cards hold real value. Other than queefing during a pitch, there are few things more awkward to them than having someone hand over a business card and only being able to offer an excuse in return.

    The reason that new business owners put so much energy into business cards is the same reason clients put so much energy into micromanaging creative—it's a lot more fun than focusing on the things you really should be doing to start your business. However, fun as it may be, on your list of pre-grand opening to-dos, great business cards fall somewhere behind:

    • Get Clients
    • Do Work
    • Get Paid

    But should be placed ahead of:

    • Get foosball table
    • Hire tattooed receptionist
    • Bring dogs to work

    Considering that you're already disagreeing with your partner over something like business cards, when you do finally get them I would advise you to hand them out quickly—you may not need them for very long.

    Happy to help,

    Speedball

    Need advice? You can contact Speedball at speedball@theegotist.com, drop him a question in the Forum or follow him on Twitter: @spdbll.

  • Are Comment-Free Fridays Just For Spineless Cowards?

    / Comments (32)

    The title alone should impart two important pieces of information. First, The Denver Egotist really does let me write whatever I want, even if it’s critical of their great establishment. And second, I have some serious reservations about the new “commentless” posts on Fridays.

    So, what’s my beef? Well, I think there are several issues at work here. The fact that The Denver Egotist had to create a comment-free day is testimony to just how ruthless and pathetic some of the comments are. The anonymous platform of this mighty blog exists for several reasons, and as I myself hide behind it, I can’t really knock it. But while I remain anonymous, I always give my full and frank opinion. I use reason, I hope, and I will concur when someone has a better point than I do.

    If I were to act like the average anonymous commenter, my posts would be a tirade of venomous spiteful barbs that have neither substance nor style. For instance – “Comment-free Fridays suck fucking balls and all the work on here is shit anyway, man you guys are lame.” Wow, so smart. I should pat myself on the back for that.

    But that is the nature of this blog. That is the beast. And to play with the beast means exposing yourself to its pointed but rancid teeth.

    With this in mind, I wonder, what does it really say about you if you only want to play with the beast when it’s muzzled?

    Now I will turn the other cheek when the work being posted is from a student, or someone down on his or her luck and hoping for a little exposure. The Denver Egotist is a large, and growing, platform for creativity in this city, and to be someone you need to be seen on this blog, among others.

    However, if you’ve already made it, and you are a powerhouse of a creative shop, should you really be posting work on Comment-Free Fridays? I will mention no names, but a certain amazingly creative local shop has started to take full advantage of CFF. In fact, it’s becoming a regular PR outlet for the agency in question. And what’s more, it is coming after years of relative silence, caused by some of the unfavorable comments left about their work over the years.

    What this says to me is something very loud and clear; it says that this shop can’t take criticism. Or rather, it won’t even allow criticism to raise its head.

    This is ridiculous.

    It’s akin to The Coen Brothers letting critics in to see their movies, but not allowing them to write a review. And that leaves a very nasty taste in the mouth.

    They do say that if you can’t take the heat, stay out of the kitchen. The CFF is kind of like saying, “If you can’t take the heat, we have a lovely, air-conditioned lounge for your enjoyment.”

    If I were at an ad agency looking to show off work, I would refuse to post it on CFF. I would post it on any day but Fridays, actually. And the reason is simple – it’s telling people that my agency is not afraid of criticism. It’s telling people to “hit me with your best shot.” It’s saying “fuck you, here’s the work, we don’t give a shit if you like it or not.”

    That’s confidence. And that kind of confidence will usually be rewarded.

    I do think CFF has its place. But it should not be a public relations tool for agencies doing very well indeed. Not only is it spineless, it’s also taking away the debate that many legitimate readers of The Denver Egotist love. They want to weigh in on the work being produced by the great agencies of Colorado. They want to say “good job” or “man, here’s what I think could have been done better.”

    The Denver Egotist is devoted to helping Denver suck less, daily. Well, I for one think that Comment-Free Fridays are putting a huge piece of duct tape around our collective voices, and that sucks big time.

    So, if you’re an ad agency posting work on CFF, please reconsider and grow a thicker skin. There will always be nasty comments, and so what? By posting on CFF, you are just letting everyone know that they got to you, and you’re scared of them.

    If, however, you are posting work with the comments turned on, I would love to buy you a large pint of foaming nut-brown ale and pat you on the back. You’ve got balls, and that kind of attitude will serve you well.

    Oh, and comments are always welcome on my posts by the way. Until you really hurt my feelings.

  • Flash Is No Longer Necessary?

    / Comments (51)

    The debate over Flash support on Apple devices was escalated with Steve Jobs' recent letter on Flash. If you want to read the full text of the letter, you can do so here:

    http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughts-on-flash/

    As a developer, specializing in Flash development, the debate is of great interest to me, and as you can probably guess, I am not all that thrilled with the stance that Apple is taking. I have a hard time understanding why Jobs is so adverse to Flash, if nothing more than the fact that omitting Flash from the iPad, and iPhone, is omitting any and all profits that could be made from the sale of Flash built apps being sold through the iTunes store.

    Let me first mention that I am by no means against abandoning one technology, for a superior technology. My livelihood depends on my ability to maintain my edge, and not become a dinosaur. When Flash introduced AS3.0, I made it a priority to abandon AS2.0, and learn my way around the overhauled language so that I could develop faster, lighter, more powerful, and ultimately better products. If something other than Flash gives me the power to do all I can in Flash, and more, I will be all over it.

    While Jobs makes several of his opinions come off as though they are facts in his letter, the one I find most outrageous is that thanks to HTML 5, “Flash is no longer necessary to watch video or consume any kind of web content.”

    Who is Jobs to tell us what is necessary and what is not. Was James Cameron’s Avatar in 3D necessary? Is an Aston Martin necessary? Is a bottle of Johnnie Walker Blue Label necessary? All online content should serve a purpose – sometimes that purpose is to get the right information quickly and without a lot of fluff (which is usually true for mobile devices with small screens), and other times that purpose might be to get a 15-year-old boy excited about the soon-to-be-released installment of Call of Duty for their Playstation or XBOX 360. And just like any tool, Flash, HTML 5, Objective C, PHP, or AJAX… you need to select the proper tool for the job.

    I’ll be honest, I am not an expert on HTML 5… yet, but from what I have seen, it is impressive, and shows a great deal of potential, and is ultimately a step in the right direction.The only problem is, since HTML 5 is not plug-in based, if your browser does not support HTML 5, you are out of luck. I know that most of us in the design and development industry are savvy enough to install and run the latest technology, especially when it comes to browsers, but sadly we are the exception, not the norm.

    Macromedia, and now Adobe, have worked hard over the years to make upgrading one's Flash player a simple, smooth, and painless experience for even the most novice of users. This is one of the reasons Flash has become so successful over the years. Not only being able to tell your clients that what you are about to build for them will be viewable by over 98% of the population, but also allowing us developers to spend more time developing content, rather than fussing around with browser compatibility issues.

    If HTML 5 can help make H.264 encoded video the standard, I have no real problem with that, but when it comes to the demand for rich, engaging, brand driven content and interaction, I just don’t see how HTML 5 can compete with Flash at this time. And by the time HTML 5 becomes any sort of realistic standard, with enough browser support for us to start responsibly pushing HTML 5 upon our clients (which I estimate is still 3 to 5 years out), I expect advances in what Flash can do, will make HTML feel severely outdated.

    The simple truth is that player based technology, proprietary or not, is not only a great way to develop once, and run anywhere, but it is also the best way to minimize the span of time between when the latest technology becomes available, and when the latest technology is accepted as a standard.

    If Flash is really so lousy, Apple should trust that the market would naturally weed it out, rather than playing the Big Brother role, and restricting it from their devices. If the claim that Flash content chews through battery life on mobile devices, people can choose not to install those apps if they don’t feel the sacrifice is worth it. If Flash content experienced through multi-touch yields a subpar experience, again… let people choose to not run those apps in favor of ones that do.

    In the end, it’s not Flash, or any other language/platform that is to blame for bulky content, or lousy experiences, it’s the development community. Depending on the skill of the developer, any program, written in any language, can be well written and highly optimized, or it can be sluggish, full of memory leaks, and prone to cause a system crash.

    Like myself, there are tens, if not hundreds of thousands of Flash developers who have spent the last 3, 5, or 10 years refining their craft when it comes to using Flash to create anything from non-interactive animations, banner ads (which help keep much of the online content free, by the way), embedded components, micro-sites, custom video players, touch-screen kiosks, games, etc. And I’m guessing most of us would like to start applying that experience to building iPhone/iPad apps, which could be sold via iTunes to the benefit of Apple’s bottom-line – but thanks to Apple and Steve Jobs, that reality was snatched from us in a spiteful and vindictive fashion that proves there is more at play than Apple wanting to “provide the most advanced and innovative platform…”

    Regardless, the fact remains that there are still billions of dollars worth of web content that has been developed, and will continue to be developed via Flash, and the thought that businesses around the globe have the desire and or budget to scrap these sites and components, and rebuild it so that nominal iPad community can consume the content is simply unrealistic. This coupled with the lack of USB port or SD slot, means the device is effectively hobbled as a serious consideration for a laptop replacement. And as Google and others begin releasing their tablets to the market, without such restrictions, it will be hard for those of us who don’t worship at the altar of Apple to justify the purchase of a device as restrictive and limiting as the iPad.

    Apple is an impressive organization that has done so much to help define and refine the user experience, and for that I commend them. I personally love my iPod, and my iPhone, thanks to their sleek and compact design, the ease of use, and the utility they provide on a daily basis. But more and more lately, Apple is starting to evolve into everything they hated about Microsoft twenty years ago. I also expect that the 10 years from now, we will probably look back on the recent letter from Steve Jobs and chuckle just a little, just like when we look back on the quote from Bill Gates, from 1981, where he made the claim that “640K ought to be enough for anybody.”

    Joe Mease is a Denver-based designer and developer, specializing in building heavily branded, dynamic, user-centric applications using Adobe Flash. Joe has been a respected member of the Flash development community for over 10 years. Find his work at joemeasecreative.com.

  • Has Copy Made a Comeback Since My First Post Back in July 2008?

    / Comments (13)

    Kind of.
    But not really.

    On July 15th, 2008, I somehow persuaded the nice(ish) folks at The Denver Egotist to give me a forum from which I could speak my mind. This was somewhere I could spout what I wanted, how I wanted, on whatever topic I wanted. I could use foul language if I desired. And oh, how I desired.

  • Does This Economy Rock or What?

    / Comments (33)

    Who else is raking it in?

    Just booked a ticket to Cabo, last-minute.

    Tonight, I’ll belly up to the sushi bar at Sushi Den and gorge on sashimi, sushi, sake and Kirin.

    Then I’ll hit the ATM, take out $200 and head downtown. Probably start at The Cruise Room. Top-shelf vodka martini. Dry. Three olives. Dance floor fuel.

    Who’s with me?

    However, I do have to be out of bed by two tomorrow, so after hours may not happen. (Never know though.) My new leather sofa and easy chair are being delivered.

    I want them perfectly arranged before the Avs. 10 rows up. Center ice.

    Before this goes any further, I should say that God didn’t bless me with much.

    But one thing God did grant me was a hyperactive, ultra-vivid imagination.

    It delivers moments of serenity after instances like my landlord reminding me that I haven’t paid rent yet. Like I need reminding.

    Here’s the lay of the land, from my view. And there are exceptions on both ends.

    Some love every second of their agency job. They’re enjoying raises, opportunities at great work, the goodness.

    Others are living the freelance dream, working with dynamic, intelligent clients who pay well AND pay on time. This group politely tells the half-witted, abusive companies that as much as they’d love to take on their project, their bandwidth is maxed.

    Good for these two groups. And I’m not being sarcastic. This world craps on achievement. I wish we embraced it more.

    And then, there is us.

    You either have a full-time job, yet daily feel like the new inmate on Cell Block D, and guess what? It’s shower time! Your world is canceling weekend plans and being thankful you’re employed. Hey, I’ve been there. Felt that pain.

    Or, you’re like me: hustling to find work, tolerating potential clients asking you to revisit that estimate you’ve already revisited. While you’re severely annoyed, the ripple effects from that project that died two months ago are kicking in.

    Oh sorry. It didn’t “die.” It’s “on hold.”

    You hold your breath before opening your mailbox. Nope, that other client’s check—the one that way more than covers the overdue rent—isn’t in there today, either.

    Anybody got Tony Soprano’s cell number?

    But besides earning a dollar, life is good for most freelancers I know. Maybe 18 months ago, I realized that the whole world is struggling. It wasn’t just me.

    I developed a new dimension of appreciation for the phrase, “Fuck it.”

    And whenever a person with a full-time job gives me that pitiful look—usually after droning on about how evil their company is—and asks how it is out here, my reply is “Whatever. The lights are on.”

    You’re not booking a vacation anytime soon, but you’re catching up on reading and painting your ass off. Getting sunburned in Wash Park on a Tuesday afternoon.

    “The lights are on” is the self-employed person’s “I’m thankful to have a job.”

    So the title of this article was my stab at being a wise-ass, right?

    Not at all.

    About a year ago, it hit me. Even with all of the negatives right now, one huge positive is happening. If times were better, this would never be possible.

    This economy is destroying everything that is wrong with this industry.

    We are at a crossroads, never seen before.

    These days, dog-and-pony shows cost money. Before, they were necessary. This is advertising, man. The Image Business®. The client needs ten t-shirts with our recommended promotional concept silk-screened on the front of it. This shows that we stand behind the idea. We’ll figure out how to bill them for this later.

    Concentrating on the short-term: a buttoned-up, bells-and-whistles-filled meeting where many pleasantries are exchanged, yet little is accomplished, used to be what our business was all about. Who cares about the long-term? That sounds so far away.

    Taking two hours to have a 30-minute status meeting used to demonstrate client commitment.

    Now, this is wasting 90 minutes of a team’s time. 90 minutes that could have been spent addressing the lagging sales curve.

    Clients want us to truly accept the fact that—while we are artists, working somewhat in the entertainment business—we also work in the stuff-selling business.

    And the stuff-selling business is receiving a long-overdue bullshit-ectomy, courtesy of the Great Recession.

    Showing off that $4000 painting you found in Santa Fe nowadays—you know, the one hanging above the receptionist’s handcrafted desk—umm, I wouldn’t do that if I were you.

    Clients won’t track with your reasoning that it makes your space—and the work you do for them—so much more creative.

    They’re going to wonder where you shoehorned its price into their bill.

    They don’t want brand awareness. They need their widgets in consumers’ hands. As their vendors, we need their widgets in consumers’ hands.

    Two types of people exist in our industry. Scenario: a client comes to you with a $100,000 marketing budget.

    Type one wants to be well compensated to apply their expertise, talent, experience and diligence in helping the client get the most mileage out of that $100,000. If some late nights and weekends are needed, no biggie. That’s what they signed on for.

    Type two immediately starts strategizing about how to pocket as much of that $100,000 as possible. They burn the midnight oil devising justifications for their gigantic estimate. They list out vendors who are cool with padding estimates. Every opportunity to tack on extra money is examined.

    Ever hear the agency-ese term “profit center”? Many times, when translated into English, it means “client-gouging opportunity”. A 25-30% markup for brokering an outside service is completely fair.

    125-130% is stealing.

    Type one is a Marketing Communications Professional.

    Type two is unethical.

    If this sounds harsh, guess what? Type two was our contribution to the Great Recession.

    Wall Street wasn’t the only guilty party. Madison Avenue had a hand in it, too.

    Type one will be our industry’s contribution to the economic recovery.

    The Great Recession has its crosshairs on type two.

    You know what’s inherently beautiful about a crossroads? Sure, there are pitfalls out there in the abyss.

    But I’m wagering there are bridges out there as well.

    Bridges that lead to some stunning places, better than any of us can imagine at the moment because we’re all busy trying to get by.

    Think about why you got into this business. Then take a minute and list out what makes you hate this business.

    Remember: you’re at a crossroads. Out here, you can perfect the good and eradicate the bad at the same time.

    Chaos is cool like that.

    A decades-old quote, supposedly from a client, was “Half of my advertising budget is wasted. Problem is, I have no idea which half.”

    Well, The Great Recession is demanding we as marketing professionals find out which half is which. Now.

    It’s forcing us to make our work, well, work.

    Some people think this fact is a negative. And they’re the ones holding our industry back.

    They’re holding our clients—and economic growth—back.

    Sound grandiose? Applied correctly, our craft drives businesses forward. As the saying goes, the right creative makes one marketing dollar work like two.

    Those of you in the workforce who yearn for the old days, who wish things would just go back to the way they were, it’s time to let go.

    The way things were? They landed us here.

    You’re holding out for the ex. That ex who isn’t going to call, tell you how wrong they were, then beg you to take them back.

    You know why I thank the economic meltdown?

    It forced me to evolve in ways that I always wanted to, only were both too lazy and terrified of doing before. It seemed so unfamiliar. So scary.

    My annoying jobs before? Hoo-boy were they well-paying yet annoying jobs.

    A writer’s pain, say, mid-2007 (each discipline from Account Service to Media to Illustration to WebDev to Design has their own brand of pain. I totally empathize. Just giving you a snapshot of ours.):

    “Ummm… we looked at your copy. And well… here, where you say ‘double the amount’… we feel your copy isn’t very good copy. In fact, it’s horrible. So instead, um… we should say ‘twice the amount.’ See, that’s much better copy… MISTER Copywriter.”

    Good call. Market share would disintegrate if we said “double” instead of “twice.”

    “And where you write ‘we’ll send you”, we’d like to say ‘you’ll receive’.”

    You’ll receive my foot in your ass if my invoice isn’t paid in thirty days.

    No one has asked me to spin my wheels lately. These days, why would people want me to do this? Wheel-spinning is inefficient.

    There’s a name for the type of job that has died on me: Dig A Hole, Then Fill It.

    These days, plenty of holes are already out there. In fact, market share is flowing directly into these holes. Why dig more?

    If you’ve been in this business a while, you’ve been asked to show off.

    Wow ‘em.

    Dance.

    These days, people ask why we’re dancing on company time. And instead of t-shirts, we’re being asked to wow ‘em with an initiative that drives bottom-line growth.

    And maybe it’s just me, but I swear that the number of turd-polishing exercises have diminished. Have we refocused? Are we making sure we’re not delivering turds in the first place?

    People now hire me for my weird-ass mind. They embrace me looking at their business and putting it on paper in ways that they can’t.

    I’m doing the best work of my career. It just would be nice to have a little more of it. The outside isn’t bleak and desolate, just a tad lean.

    But whatever, the lights are on.

    Here and there, they’ve been flickering. But they’re on.

    Finances? Numbers are quantifiable. If I’m stressed because rent is due, that number offers a framework for that stress.

    I used to stress that opportunity had passed me by because I was too terrified of leaping at the brass ring. That kind of stress is impossible to quantify.

    Give me financial stress any day.

    To The Great Recession, I’ll say I don’t like you one bit. Sorry, that wasn’t clear enough. I hate roughly 99.6% of you.

    I hate your ability to bring out the worst in people.

    I now know how threatening change and evolution are in people’s minds, simply because these concepts differ from the status quo. That broken, pathetic, miserable status quo.

    You inspired people to devise new ways to knife each other in the back that should be recorded in the history books. Future generations could study these as testaments to humanity’s ugly and disgusting sides.

    Even with all of the negativity you brought, I partially understand why you arrived and showed us some economic tough love.

    I—and I can’t speak for anybody else—needed it.

    As I step off my soapbox,

    Anybody got any work?

    Creative Direction, Copywriting, Brand Strategy, Naming—basically I help clients think of interesting ways to sell their stuff. My answer to the "Creative vs. Strategic" debate is replace the "vs." with an "and." When I do this, consumers are happy, the client is happy, and I'm happy. And I'm all about being happy. I'm Chris Maley. Contact me. Let's hang out and be happy.

  • Advice On: Titles

    / Comments (3)

    I'm a freelance copywriter, but I'm not sure what exactly to call myself. Copywriter, freelance copywriter, creative director, copycat?

    The reason you don't know what to call yourself is because nobody in this business has a title that means anything anymore.

    Anyone can call themselves anything. And do.

    Since we're on the topic of meaningless titles I'd like to digress for a moment into a subspecies of the meaningless title: The totally bullshit title. The trend reared it's ugly head for awhile in the 90s, and seems like it's gaining a little traction again. If you have Jedi, Ninja, Rockstar, Guru, Diva, or Insurgent in your title, you're heading down a path that Sting and The Edge have been regretting for decades. Stop the title orgy before it starts.

    Back to your problem. It's easy. You write copy? You're a Copywriter. You do from your basement? Freelance Copywriter. Have you been doing it for more than, I don't know, maybe 7 years? Great, now you're a Senior Copywriter. Do you tell other Copywriters what to write? Congratulations, you're a Creative Director. Do you take credit for other Creative Director's work? Fantastic, you're an Executive Creative Director. Do you not only take credit for their work but also present it as your own while talking on the phone to someone in another country? Hello Mr. Global Creative Director.

    Just be glad you're not a designer. Other than the UX/UI/IA/SME BSers, they're the most screwed up. Talk about titles that don't reflect your actual skills. I'm really not even sure there are designers anymore, I think you just start out as a Senior Designer now. That is, if you're unlucky enough to get hired by a shop that still has Senior Designers. In all likelihood you'll just start out as an Art Director and if you get to design your own business cards you're just going to jump straight ahead to Creative Director. Interns are production designers and production designers are...well, I guess they're still production designers. And God bless them for it.

    Happy to help,

    Speedball

    Need advice? You can contact Speedball at speedball@theegotist.com, drop him a question in the Forum or follow him on Twitter: @spdbll.

  • Making Digital Work: A Recap

    / Comments (9)

    Making Digital Work, Boulder Digital Works' latest 36-hour executive workshop, is over, and depending on who's tweeting, attendees are relieved, excited or scared shitless. The 2.5 day event attracted clients, agency types, and of course, the nerds. One very important walk-away fact? Embrace the nerds – your inner nerd and those you work with, for they hold the future in their hands like a small kitten.

    New tech steamrolled over the audience as some attendees looked for help from 60-weekers, aka the full-time students at BDW, now becoming programmers, strategists, creative technologists and more at the up and coming school. Foursquare played a big role, in the form of a swarm of the BDW conference room and discovery of the identity of the men's room mayor. Plenty of blog, Facebook and Twitter talk filled the room as well.

    As far as speakers go, an impressive array of heavy-hitters brought great digital work to the forefront. Led by Matt Howell from Modernista and Gareth Kay from Goodby, a mixture of chats, workshops, foodstuffs and beverages kept the crowd rolling towards a bright digital future.

    Highlights included:

    Edward Boches from Mullen, deftly discussing how the torch must be passed from advertising to digital. Or more specifically, how a generation of ad men need to die.

    Michael Tabtabai from Chiat/Day and his robust facial hair discussed some outstanding concepts in the digital realm.

    Gareth Kay described the fate of the traditional creative brief.

    Brad Smith told the story of Best Buy's complete and total embracement of social media, including Twelpforce.

    Derek Robson spoke on the transformation of Goodby, Silverstein and Partners from old-school traditional advertising to digital juggernaut.

    Richard Schatzberger from BBH spoke about the creative technologist, a new agency role that we'll see popping up more and more.

    Matt Howell from Modernista chewed the fat on loads of other good things, including digital production challenges.

    Now, the course is over, but the presentations and vids remain. And this is some seriously good shit. Like it or not, the future has arrived. Grab your lunch pill, put on your silver jumpsuit and hop in your flying car and watch these Ustreams from the sessions.
    Stay tuned to #digiwork – if you don't know what that means, please attend the next BDW Workshop.

  • Advice On: Getting Hired As A Team

    / Comments (21)

    I've been unemployed for six months and have been doing nothing but nonstop interviewing without any luck. I know a copywriter who is in the same situation I'm in and we've decided to try to get hired as a team. How do you think the best way to do this is?

    Thanks for taking a break from your intense interview schedule to write. First, I have a question for you: Your note implies that you have previously convinced someone to hire you. Did you make that part up?

    You've been struggling to regain employment for six months. Naturally you've concluded that the appropriate next step will be to compound the complexity and expense necessary to hire you.

    Great idea.

    The real strength of your plan is that the work you'll be presenting to get these two jobs will be the same exceptional work that has served each of you so well in your individual job searches. You won't even need to redo your books, you can just show up in tandem and run through the formality of showing your well-worn work before getting those inevitable job offers!

    While your plan is nearly flawless, I propose that you not limit yourselves to a simple menage a deux of design and copy. Consider the benefits of applying alongside an Account Manager, Traffic Coordinator, Web Programmer, Strategist, Production Designer, Media Buyer, and maybe a Twitter expert or two. By doing so, your future employer won't be burdened by the prohibitively complicated process of hiring a few creatives and can instead step easily into a simple merger with you and the A-Team.

    There's no question in my mind that this is a compelling plan conceived by two great thinkers. Good luck to you and your new partner, please keep me apprised as your inevitable rise to stardom progresses.

    Happy to help,

    Speedball

    Need advice? You can contact Speedball at speedball@theegotist.com, drop him a question in the Forum or follow him on Twitter: @spdbll.

  • Chipotle, What Is That Nasty Taste You Left In My Mouth?

    / Comments (12)

    Could it be bitterness? Sarcasm? Scorn? Maybe it's good, old-fashioned animosity. Whatever it is, it's putrid. And coming on the back of a campaign that sucked so much we dedicated a website to it, I have to wonder what it going on over there in the Chipotle marketing department.

    As you may recall from the venom that spewed from my mouth, I was not happy that they ditched the big burritos and big statements in favor of weedy statements supporting an even weedier value menu. It was as much of a 180 as any brand could do. To say it sucked would be an insult to things that suck.

    After a few months, the ad campaign, loathed by so many, simply disappeared. The ad agency Butler, Shine, Stern & Partners "parted company" from Chipotle. And we were told the work was going to be taken in-house.

    That phrase "in-house" leaves most ad professionals shaking in their shoes. Not from fear, but from rage. Not that I'm saying in-house teams produce crappy work, it's more a case of a very different dynamic at work. It's a lot more difficult to get honest opinions out of anyone when you sit in each others' pockets day in, day out. The agency-client dynamic is perverted, to such a point that no one is really sure of the quality of the work any more. It's been through so many corporate mincing machines that the final product is far from exciting. It's dull.

    If only the word "dull" could be used to describe the new Chipotle campaign from their in-house team.

    What we have here is one of Luke Sullivan's classic "your strategy is showing" moments. But what kind of bizarre, self-centered, whiny strategy is this? Here's how I envisioned a board meeting at Chipotle, based on this new work:

    Chris: "Well guys, the last campaign really was awful. We screwed up. Can we admit that?"

    [Silence]

    Chris: "What I meant to say is that Butler, Shine, Stern and Partners really fucked us over on that last ad campaign."

    [Board room erupts in applause]

    Chris: "These ad guys, they're all the same. All they care about is the work in their books, looking cool and taking our money."

    Intern: "I know I'm only here to bring the coffee, but that work was not exactly book worthy anyway was it?"

    Chris: "No one asked you. Now, we need a fresh approach, one that gets us back on track and builds the brand higher and higher..."

    Intern: "You mean like all the original work that shops like TDA did?"

    Chris: "No, better. But we also need to let everyone out there know that we weren't responsible for that last abortion of a campaign. In fact, BSSP made us do it. (Pre-empts intern) Yes, they did. The value menu was their idea. Changing the look of the brand, all them. They pulled an AK-47 in one meeting and told us to sign the approvals. We did, knowing it would sink our beloved Chipotle brand. BUT NO MORE! We'll bring the work in-house. We'll stand over the creatives and write lines for them, art direct them, and shove the following strategy down their throats – Ad agencies should be blamed for crappy ads, all we want to do is talk about the product. But then, and this is the genius part, we'll manufacture a straw-man ad agency and say they forced us to write some half-assed lines. We'll sneak the real copy in under the demands of the fake agency, because they are all knowing. It will get everyone on our side. Now, where's my damned bonus check?"

    See what I mean? Forget that EVERY client has final say over the work that goes out. Forget that. Forget also that EVERY client has to sign off on the brief and the strategy. Or at least, they do when they're playing at this level. Just forget all of that, and instead look at the work now being produced.

    Chipotle has brought the work in-house. They have complete control of the campaign. They can say whatever they want. If they really wanted to have an ad all about the cilantro in their rice, they could do it. But they don't! Instead, they manufacture some bullshit ad agency to blame the crappy ad on, in a failed attempt at humor, irreverence and an ungrateful nod back to the campaigns of old. You know, the campaigns that helped Chipotle grow and grow.

    I've seen some screwed up ads in my time, but these new ones just floor me. Even if this straw man idea was executed well, who cares?! Who cares about what the ad agencies forced you to do in the past? Sure, ad geeks like us do, but we represent a microscopic percentile of the population. Think my dad is gonna look at a new ad and go "hey, good for them. I'm eating at Chipotle from now on 'cause they're sticking it to the ad man, with their fancy cars and big-titted account execs." No way.

    My dad will give a puzzled look and move on. But back in the day, when the ads said "Open Wide. No Wider." next to a big-assed burrito, he knew just what he was getting. A big, tasty, calorie-packed monster of a meal. When we called out the ads from BSSP, we never thought they'd cut off their own nose to spite their face. What a waste.

    I can't say enough bad shit about the new campaign. Not only is it poorly thought through and executed, it is another nail in the coffin of advertising. This not only bites the hand the feeds it, it basically says that ad agencies everywhere are more concerned with being 'cool' than doing work that does the job right. WRONG. Good ad agencies thrive when the client thrives. They want to do work that works. Sorry Chipotle, but everyone responsible for this latest sham needs to step down and give the ad agencies out there one last chance to fix what you have all messed up.

    It won't be easy. But a decent agency can do it...as long as the people responsible for this mess get out of the damned way. That is all.